Trust
Trust Methodology
How Jigyasa curates and shows wisdom — process honesty, not a scholar console. Seekers should be able to tell curated, model-composed, pending, and field-reviewed apart — and see where a matched answer came from without overclaiming review scope.
Four states
Curated corpus
A human-selected entry with source, reference, commentary, and practice. Keyword retrieval can ground a Sutra in that entry. On matched Trust Pack journeys, lineage may also show as source-detail fields (original, translation, commentary, application) — empty fields are omitted, never invented.
Model composition
When enrich runs, understanding, wisdom, and reflection may be rewritten from the matched entry. Source, practice, citations, and source-detail fields stay locked to the corpus. Separate chips say when AI composition happened.
Not yet field-reviewed
Most corpus rows — and four of twelve Trust Pack entries — have no dated field-scoped human review yet. That is not rejection; it means no scoped badge.
Field-reviewed
A dated review lists which fields were checked. Today that is often source, reference, commentary, and application on a subset of the Trust Pack. It never means the full entry, full Trust Pack, or full corpus is verified. Thin original/translation concept labels are not claimed as verse-level review.
What badges mean
Example: Reviewed · source, reference, commentary, application · 2026-07-23Credit on current badges: Founder review (external advisor shortfall documented).
- Date — when the field review was recorded.
- Fields — only those listed were reviewed; other fields may still be pending.
- Optional credit — e.g. founder review, or an advisor with consent.
- Never “fully verified” unless every claimable field for that entry is listed.
- Concept-label original/translation text is shown as lineage when present, but is not treated as verse-level review unless those fields appear on the badge.
Curated-vs-AI chips (Week 5) are a different vocabulary from field-review badges. They answer different questions.
Trust Pack scope
The front-door Trust Pack is a small Ready set of 12 entries with precise references. A CI / build guard fails if any pack id lacks a non-empty reference. Field reviews currently cover 8 of 12 pack entries (cold-demo lock 5 plus three more). Unreviewed pack entries stay Not yet field-reviewed — no vanity Reviewed chrome.
Source detail (lineage)
Matched journeys can show “Where this came from” with source, reference, and omit-empty lineage fields. That block answers where the answer came from; the dated badge answers which fields a human actually checked. Empty lineage fields are omitted — never padded with Pending theater.
How reviews happen
Reviews are a manual packet workflow: entry id, fields checklist, claim boundaries, then additive corpus metadata. There is no advisor login, review queue, or scholar console in product. The shared packet lives in docs/ADVISOR_REVIEW_PACKET.md. Until an external advisor completes a pass, badges credit Founder review honestly.
Claim boundaries
- Curated is not the same as field-reviewed.
- AI composition is not scholar approval.
- One field reviewed is not a fully verified entry.
- Eight of twelve pack badges is not a fully verified Trust Pack.
- The Trust Pack is not the full corpus.
- Source detail on a journey is corpus lineage — not an extra review claim.
- There is no live Wisdom Council validating every answer.
- Reviews today are founder-credited; external advisors are invited via a manual packet, not a console.
See it on a live Sutra: open the Trust Panel scholar row, or try Saarthi.